Although many claims in the Hebrew bible are not necessarily backed up by factual evidence, several aspects of it are, indeed, proven historically. The first piece of evidence used by archaeologists to justify biblical validity is several different execration texts. Several artifacts such as letters that mention Egypt and Jerusalem have been found, as well as a wall and tower found near the Gihon. Finally, several Amarna letters have been found which link the Egyptian leaders with representatives from all of Canaan, pointing to the inclusion of Jerusalem in Egyptian affairs.
To argue against the validity of the bible, several scholars bring up the issue of the Israelites. Although we know that they were at one point in Jerusalem, how they got there remains a mystery. Some believe that they just suddenly appeared there, while others believe that they slowly immigrated over time. Finally, archaeological evidence suggests that they were always there, but is refuted by the book of Exodus which talks about their leaving of Egypt.
To argue against the validity of the bible, several scholars bring up the issue of the Israelites. Although we know that they were at one point in Jerusalem, how they got there remains a mystery. Some believe that they just suddenly appeared there, while others believe that they slowly immigrated over time. Finally, archaeological evidence suggests that they were always there, but is refuted by the book of Exodus which talks about their leaving of Egypt.
No comments:
Post a Comment